Legal Opinion

Parker v. Reter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff’s person and property when his automobile collided with two heifers owned by defendant. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff.

Defendant was the owner of a ranch upon which he raised cattle. The ranch was in a closed range district where cattle are prohibited from running at large. ① The cattle escaped from defendant’s barn, passed through an open gate and went upon the adjoining highway. Plaintiff’s automobile collided with two of the animals. At the time of the accident it was dark, the pavement was damp and there were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kendall v. CURLOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Corey v. Smith CaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Fugett v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  4. Gardner v. . BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Stewart v. WildSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Watzig v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grubb v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Dunlap v. DicksonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kathren v. OlenikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Bilderback v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API