Legal Opinion

Joyce v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 30, 1997No. 1:89-cv-01599PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

CURTIN, District Judge.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs commenced this class action against Curtiss-Wright Corporation (“Curtiss-Wright”) in December 1989 under section 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (“ERISA”) and Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 (“LMRA”).. Plaintiffs. are a class of retired Curtiss-Wright employees who were represented by the United Steelworkers of America (“United Steelworkers”). Plaintiffs currently seek a determination that CurtissWright breached its collective bargaining…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Pens. Plan Guide P 23921b Gleniss S. Schonholz v. Long Island Jewish Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  2. Fitch v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  3. Constantine v. American Airlines Pension Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
  4. Layaou v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
  5. Pronti v. CNA Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API