Legal Opinion
Layaou v. Xerox Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 28, 1999No. 95-CV-6388LPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, John Layaou, originally commenced this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The original complaint alleged that defendants Xerox Corporation (“Xerox”) and Peter DeMauro, plaintiffs former supervisor, terminated his employment in January 1994 on account of his age. Plaintiff (who was born in 1940) also asserted an age discrimination claim under the New York State Human Rights Law (“HRL”), N.Y.Exec.L. § 296, as well as what apparently purported to be a breach-of-contract claim…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Layaou v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Frommert v. ConkrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Layaou v. Xerox Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2004
- Montesano v. Xerox Corp. Retirement Income Guarantee PlanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Edwards v. Akzo Nobel, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.