Legal Opinion

People v. Solario

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1977No. Crim. 19803PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Following denial of his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (i)), defendant pleaded guilty to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 459). Seeking review of the search and seizure issue, he appeals from the judgment ■ of conviction (order granting probation) entered on his guilty plea. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5, subd. (m).)

We hold that a police officer, having probable cause to believe a residence is being burglarized, need not comply with the “knock and notice” requirements of Penal Code section 844 before entering to arrest the burglar. As we demonstrate below,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kaplan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Duke v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. BadgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. CornejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. StrelowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. State v. HutchinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API