Legal Opinion
Duke v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided December 4, 1969No. L. A. 29657PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*317Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
The District Attorney of Los Angeles County filed an information against Paul George Duke, Jr., charging him with possession of sodium secobarbital, a restricted dangerous drug, in violation of section 11910 of the Health and Safety Code. Petitioner entered a plea of not guilty and moved to suppress evidence under section 1538.5 of the Penal Code. The parties stipulated to the submission of the motion on the transcript of the preliminary examination and argument by counsel. The superior court held a special hearing (§ 1538.5, subd. (i)) and denied the motion. Petitioner…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. HaskettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. DumasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Mann v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.