Legal Opinion
Canadian Tarpoly Co. v. U.S. International Trade Commission
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 5, 1981No. ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-54; No. 81-5PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Markey, Chief Judge.
Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus against the International Trade Commission (ITC). We deny the petition.
BACKGROUND
The matter results from an ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-54, “In the Matter of Certain Multicellular Plastic Film,” conducted under *122sections 337 and 337a of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337 and 1337a). Sealed Air Corp. there alleged unfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the unlicensed importation into the United States of certain multicellular plastic film allegedly manufactured in a foreign country by the process covered in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mississippi Chemical Corporation v. Swift Agricultural Chemicals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Badger-Powhatan, Div. of Figgie v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Gerald P. Brickner and Royce L. Hackl v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- UST, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Viscofan, S.A. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, Union Carbide Corporation, and Teepak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.