Viscofan, S.A. v. U.S. International Trade Commission, Union Carbide Corporation, and Teepak, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.
This petition to review challenges (1) aspects of a remedial order the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) entered in a proceeding under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (1982), and 19 U.S.C. § 1337a (1982), and (2) the Commission’s refusal to declassify confidential information that had been submitted during the Commission proceedings pursuant to a protective order. We affirm the challenged portions of the remedial order and dismiss the challenge to the refusal to declassify as an issue over which we have no jurisdiction.
I
A.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Canadian Tarpoly Co. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Nick N. Novicky, George F. Tsuetaki v. Nick N. NovickyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Akzo N.V. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Monolithic Power System, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- General Electric Co. v. SungDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Swagway, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'nCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.