Legal Opinion
Badger-Powhatan, Div. of Figgie v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 29, 1985No. 85-3-00324PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, Judge:
Plaintiff, a domestic producer of brass fire protection products, seeks relief in the nature of mandamus to compel the United States Department of Commerce to amend antidumping order issued in the investigation of Certain Brass Fire Protection Products from Italy. 50 Fed.Reg. 8354. More specifically, plaintiff seeks to include within the scope of antidumping order five imported products found not to have caused material injury to a United States industry. Defendants and intervenor oppose plaintiffs application and cross-move for order dismissing plaintiffs complaint for failure to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- City Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- City Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Canadian Tarpoly Co. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
3Cited by28 opinions
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Federal Mogul Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- National Ass'n of Mirror Manufacturers v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Badger-Powhatan, a Div. of Figgie Intern. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.