Legal Opinion

B.F.G. Builders v. Weisner & Coover Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1962No. Civ. 125PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

The cross-complainant appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court after granting a motion to strike the entire first amended cross-complaint. As the cross-defendant is a party to the action only by virtue of the cross-complaint, the ruling completely eliminates it from the case, and consequently there is a right to appeal from the order at this stage of the litigation. (People v. Buellton Dev. Co., 58 Cal.App.2d 178, 181 [136 P.2d 793]; Howe v. Key System Transit Co., 198 Cal. 525, 533 [246 P. 39]; American Can Co. v. City & County of San Francisco, 202 Cal.App.2d 520, 522…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. San Francisco Unified School District v. California Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Borden CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
  3. People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Nomellini Construction Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Fleck v. Bollinger Home Corp. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API