B.F.G. Builders v. Weisner & Coover Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The cross-complainant appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered by the trial court after granting a motion to strike the entire first amended cross-complaint. As the cross-defendant is a party to the action only by virtue of the cross-complaint, the ruling completely eliminates it from the case, and consequently there is a right to appeal from the order at this stage of the litigation. (People v. Buellton Dev. Co., 58 Cal.App.2d 178, 181 [136 P.2d 793]; Howe v. Key System Transit Co., 198 Cal. 525, 533 [246 P. 39]; American Can Co. v. City & County of San Francisco, 202 Cal.App.2d 520, 522…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- San Francisco Unified School District v. California Building Maintenance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Alisal Sanitary District v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Borden CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- People v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Nomellini Construction Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fleck v. Bollinger Home Corp. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.