Legal Opinion

Fleck v. Bollinger Home Corp. Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1997No. B096217PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

A land developer sells a lot which contains a residential building pad. The lot is eventually sold to a builder who constructs a house on the pad. Plaintiff buys the house. The house suffers damage from subsidence. The 10-year statute of limitations prevents plaintiff from suing the developer. Plaintiff sues the builder. The builder cross-complains for indemnity against the developer.

May builder assign its cross-complaint to plaintiff? Yes. May the trial court award damages on the cross-complaint directly to plaintiff? Yes.

Here the trial court ruled that plaintiff is…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stearman v. Centex HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. FNB Mortgage Corp. v. Pacific General GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Searles Valley Minerals Operations Inc. v. Ralph M. Parsons Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Stearman v. Centex HomesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Boyajian v. ORDOUBADICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API