Legal Opinion

Quik Payday, Inc. v. Stork

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 12, 2008No. 07-3289PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Quik Payday, Inc., which used the Internet in making short-term loans, appeals from the district court’s rejection of its constitutional challenge to the application of Kansas’s consumer-lending statute to those loans. Defendants were Judi M. Stork, Kansas’s acting bank commissioner, and Kevin C. Glendening, deputy commissioner of the state’s Office of the State Bank Commission (OSBC), both in their official capacities.

Quik Payday argues that applying the statute runs afoul of the dormant Commerce Clause by (1) regulating conduct that occurs wholly outside Kansas, (2) un…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. TitleMax of Delaware Inc v. Robin WeissmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  2. IMS Health Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. City of Hugo v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  4. Energy & Environment Legal Institute v. EpelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API