Legal Opinion
City of Hugo v. Nichols
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2011No. 10-7043, 10-7044PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. Introduction
The City of Hugo, Oklahoma, and the Hugo Municipal Authority, a public water trust, (collectively “Hugo”) have contracted with the City of Irving, Texas, (“Irving”) for the sale of water Hugo has been or *1254seeks to be allocated under permits issued by the Oklahoma Water Resources Board (“Board”). Hugo and Irving brought suit against the nine members of the Board for a declaration that certain Oklahoma laws governing the Board’s water allocation decisions are unconstitutional under the dormant Commerce Clause and an injunction prohibiting their enforcement.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gomillion v. LightfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bishop v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Honors Acad., Inc. v. Tex. Educ. AgencyTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- WildEarth Guardians v. Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Board of Water Works Trustees of the City of Des Moines, Iowa v. Sac County Board of Supervisors, as Trustee of Drainage Districts 32, 42, 65, 79, 81, 83, 86, and Calhoun County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 2 and 51 and Buena Vista County Board of Supervisors and Sac County Board of Supervisors as Joint Trustees of Drainage Districts 19Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.