Legal Opinion

Slaughter v. Zimman

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1951No. Civ. 18257PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs on their complaint to recover the value of professional services rendered by their assignors to defendant minors and against defendants on their cross-complaint for damages resulting from alleged malpractice by plaintiffs, defendants appeal. There is also a purported appeal from the order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial.

Facts: In response to plaintiffs’ complaint defendants filed a cross-complaint on behalf of the minors which was prepared by Attorney Theodore Epstein. At the time of the trial on May 17, 1950, defendant Louis Zimman appearing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mission Film Corp. v. Chadwick Pictures Corp.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Berry v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Jones v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Guardianship of LovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doyle v. GiuliucciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Barrett v. GagnonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Wells Fargo Bank v. DowdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Specht v. KeitelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API