Guardianship of Lovern
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This appeal is taken from an order restoring one Lovern to mental capacity under the provisions of section 1766 of the Code of Civil Procedure. At the time set for the hearing of the matter, a daughter of the incapacitated Lovern appeared by attorney and asked for a continuance, in order that thereafter she might oppose the application. Her motion for a continuance was refused, and this appeal upon her part is largely based upon that order of refusal.
In all cases the action of the trial court in granting or refusing a continuance is more or less a matter of discretion. But it is essentially a…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ross v. ThirlwallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Slaughter v. ZimmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951