Legal Opinion

Berry v. Ryan

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1950No. Civ. 17359PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover for money allegedly due under a contract, and against defendant on his cross-complaint seeking to recover money he had paid to plaintiff under a contract, defendant appeals. There is also a purported appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Respondent (plaintiff) has not favored this court with a brief.' Appellant (defendant) seeks reversal of the judgment on the ground, among others, that the evidence does not sustain material findings of fact of the trial court. Since respondent has not filed a brief we assume…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Postin v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Bendlage v. KohlsaatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Lawrence v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rooz v. KimmelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Slaughter v. ZimmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Roth v. KeeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Smith v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API