Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Capitol Lumber Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1914No. 22,539PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Prom Johnson Cirenit Court; William E. Deupree, Judge. Action by the Capitol Lumber Company against Samuel Y. Anderson and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

Action was begun March 10, 1910, by appellee against appellants on a promissory note, maturing March 4, 1909. Alexander answered in three paragraphs, the first a general denial, the second payment. By the third paragraph Alexander alleges his execution of the note as surety for Anderson, and that the fact was known to appellee, and that on February 9, 1909, the latter and Anderson entered into a written agreement, setting it out, the material parts of which are as follows:

“Feb. 3rd, 1909.

Mr. Geo. W. Anderson, Sumner, Miss. Dear Sir: — As per conversation with you, we hereby agree to purchase…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Abel v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Dickerson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Menifee v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Warrum v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Whittington v. Dragon Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  3. Terry v. DavenportIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Promotion Co. v. SweeneyOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Hughes v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API