Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1855PublishedCited by 26 opinions

APPEAL from the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Bill in chancery by sureties to enforce an alleged equitable estoppel.

The bill alleges that Dickerson and John L. Shook were sureties, and David P. Shook principal, in a surplus revenue bond for the loan of 203 dollars, executed on the 11th of February, 1847, with interest payable in advance. The bond is stated to have been joint and several, but that the relation of principal and surety subsisting between the obligors was well known to the county officers with whom the loan was negotiated. It was due February 11, 1848. On the third of March, 1848, the ninth of March, 1849, and the fifth of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fellows v. PrentissCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  2. Hedger v. RennakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
  3. Harbert v. DumontIndiana Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Wheeler, Osgood & Co. v. RalphWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Platt v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Burt v. BowlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Post v. LoseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. American Food Co. v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Menifee v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Hamilton v. WinterrowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API