Legal Opinion

Ransdel v. Moore

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1899No. 18,500PublishedCited by 79 opinions

Erom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

This action was brought by appellants against appellees to enforce a trust in real estate. Appellees’ demurrer for want of facts was sustained to the fourth and fifth paragraphs of the complaint, the other paragraphs having been-withdrawn, and appellants refusing to plead further judgment was rendered against them. The action of the court in sustaining said demurrer is called in question by the assignment of errors.

It is alleged in the fourth paragraph: That, “Elizabeth A. Rodgers, the sister of appellants, was the owner of real estate in Clinton county, Indiana, [describing it] of the value…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Hamer v. . SidwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Wood v. . RabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Ryan v. . DoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Latham v. Father DivineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Pope v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Knight & Jillson Co. v. CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Richards v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Seavey v. Estate of FanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1975

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API