Legal Opinion

Cherco v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2010No. WD 70071PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Remigio Cherco appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. Cherco contends that the motion court erred in: (1) denying his motion on the grounds that his guilty pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered; and (2) denying his motion on the grounds that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the sentencing proceeding. For the following reasons we affirm the motion court’s decision.

Factual and Procedural History

Remigio Cherco was charged by the State with several violent crimes…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Deck v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Neal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Clayton R. Dunlap v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Frye v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Demario R. Bello v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API