Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2012No. WD 73588PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Aryan Neal (“Neal”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. First, Neal contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because trial counsel had a conflict of interest and acted contrary to Neal’s interests in connection with Neal’s motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Neal claims that had trial counsel not acted contrary to his interests, there is a reasonable probability that the trial court would have permitted the withdrawal of his guilty pleas and he would have exercised his right to a jury trial. Second, Neal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Aundra Woods v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Wallar v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Butler v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Covington v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Deen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API