Legal Opinion
Frye v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 2010No. WD 70504PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Galin Frye appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Frye contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because he received ineffective assistance of counsel as a result of trial counsel’s failure to inform him of a plea offer made by the State. The plea offer would have permitted Frye to plead to the amended charge of misdemeanor driving while revoked instead of going to trial on the charge of felony driving while revoked. Frye claims he would have taken the plea offer…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Frye v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Berry v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.