Legal Opinion

Clayton R. Dunlap v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2015No. WD76751PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, JUDGE

Clayton Dunlap appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Dunlap’s motion alleged that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and present mitigation evidence at sentencing and failing to investigate the allegedly unconstitutional collection of his blood. On appeal, Dunlap argues that the motion court applied the incorrect standard to determine prejudice to his claim of ineffec tive assistance of counsel at sentencing and also that the motion court erroneously failed to make findings on his claim…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  3. Worthington v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Cherco v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Steven D. Green v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  2. Southside Ventures, LLC v. La Crosse Lumber Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Mercer v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  5. Sanders v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API