State v. Ruiz
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLACK, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions for careless driving and driving while intoxicated. Defendant maintains that, in admitting the calibration log and printout of the Intoxilyzer 5000, the district court admitted impermissible hearsay, which in turn violated Defendant’s constitutional right to confront his accusers. Based on our recent decision in State v. Christian, 119 N.M. 776, 895 P.2d 676 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 119 N.M. 514, 892 P.2d 961 (1995), we disagree.
Defendant also argues that the district court erred in: (1) denying Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. DedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BullcomingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.