Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 14, 1988No. 10433PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
The state appeals from the order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence against him. The trial court found and concluded that defendant’s consent to search was not voluntary, and that the officers did not have probable cause to search or arrest defendant. The docketing statement challenged all three of these rulings. Our calendar notice proposed summary affirmance, and the state filed a memorandum in opposition to the proposed disposition. Not persuaded by the state’s memorandum, we affirm the order of the trial court.
FACTS
On May 8, 1987,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Miguel Angel RecaldeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- State v. RaelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. CohenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. FloresNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. SalasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. WilliamsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.