Legal Opinion
State v. Bullcoming
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 2010No. 31,186PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAES, Justice.
{1} Defendant, Donald Bullcoming, appeals his conviction of aggravated DWI, a fourth-degree felony, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-102 (2005, prior to amendments through 2008). Of the three issues that Defendant raises, the main question presented in this appeal is whether a laboratory report of Defendant’s blood draw results is testimonial evidence subject to the Confrontation Clause. We first addressed this issue in State v. Dedman, 2004-NMSC-037, ¶¶ 30, 45-46, 136 N.M. 561, 102 P.3d 628, and followed the United States Supreme Court case in Crawford v. Washington,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Ivan CurbeloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- State of Tennessee v. Thomas Lee HutchisonTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Michael R. GriepWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. AragonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.