Legal Opinion

Plante v. Canadian National Railways

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 3, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurchie, J.

This case comes to the court on separate general motions for a new trial filed on behalf of both defendants following a verdict for the plaintiff for $600 against both defendants. There are no exceptions.

The material facts are not in dispute. From the evidence it definitely and clearly appears that the plaintiff, late at night in midwinter, was travelling as a passenger in an automobile, driven by the defendant St. Laurent, along a highway in the *218City of Auburn, across which the defendant Canadian National Railways maintained a crossing at grade; that, within a few minutes prior to the time…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Stevens v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  4. Gilman v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  5. Trask v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. CogburnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  2. Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Josselyn v. DearbornSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  4. Pelkey v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  5. Buczkowski v. Canton R.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API