Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Cogburn
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall
Plaintiffs in error were defendants below and we shall refer to them as defendants or to the Union Pacific Railroad Company as the railroad. We will refer to defendants in error as plaintiffs and shall at times refer to plaintiff Roland Rex Cogburn as Rex.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff, Rex, arising out of a collision of a car being driven by him with a train of defendant railroad standing on and blocking a public highway crossing. Plaintiff Harry R. Cogburn, father of Rex and joint owner of the car in question, seeks to recover…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Fabling v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Coleman v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Werner v. SchraderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Ridenour v. DiffeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ricardo Trevino v. Union Pacific Railroad Company and Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Pizza v. Wolf Creek Ski Development Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Ferguson v. GardnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Lawrence R. Kinsella, Stanley Dilley and Duane L. Ault v. Ralph Leonard and Quinten KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Clark v. BunnellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.