Legal Opinion

Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1950PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages to person and property resulting from a collision by plaintiff Finn’s automobile with a train standing on a grade crossing at the intersection of Northwest Vaughn street and Northwest 22nd avenue in Portland, Oregon. The plaintiff insurance company is a party by reason of having paid the cost of repairing the automobile. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in chief, the defendant railroad company moved for a judgment of involuntary nonsuit on the grounds that: (1) there is no evidence tending to show negligence of the defendant; and (2) the plaintiff…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lauson v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Murphy v. HawthorneOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barnum v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Brown v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Rogers v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Schukart v. GerousbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Finn v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API