Legal Opinion

Karoware, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 20, 1977No. 77-14PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mareey, Chief Judge.

Appeal from judgment of the Customs Court, 77 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 4681, 427 F. Supp. 402 (1977), sustaining the classifications of the Customs Service. We affirm.

*3Background

Appellant Karoware, Inc. (Karoware), an importer of barware, brought two actions, later consolidated, in which it alleged misclassi-fication of wooden wine racks, and bars. Evidence at trial concerned: (1) wonder and book bars, classified as sets under TSUS Items 651.75 1 and 546.52, and claimed as household utensils of wood under TSUS Item 206.97; (2) keg, tavern, castle, and roll top executive bars,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The United States v. New York Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  4. Herbert G. Schwarz, Dba Ski Imports v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sanyo Electric Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Abbey Rents v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. United States v. PorterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. Ferriswheel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API