Legal Opinion
People v. St. Jean
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2012PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant contends that County Court’s determination of his risk level is not supported by the requisite clear and convincing evidence (see § 168-n [3]). We reject that contention. “The statements in the case summary and presentence report with respect to defendant’s substance abuse constitute reliable hearsay supporting the court’s assessment of points under the risk factor for history of drug or alcohol abuse” (People v Ramos, 41 AD3d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. McDanielAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. WoodardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. MerkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. EnglantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. NilsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.