Legal Opinion
People v. Howard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Silverman, J.), entered on or about September 12 and October 12, 2006, which respectively, denied defendant’s motion to declare uncon*274stitutional the procedures used to determine his risk level pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), and adjudicated him a level three sex offender, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In making its determination, the court properly considered grand jury minutes, which constituted “reliable hearsay evidence” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]). The Confrontation Clause does not apply to these…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DortAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. BligenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. JoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MingoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People ex rel. Ryan v. WardenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- State v. J.A.New York Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. HarmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- GARDINER, DAVID L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012