Legal Opinion
People v. Robertson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 2012PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ([SORA] Correction Law § 168 et seq.). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court erred in assessing 30 points against him under risk factor 3, for having three or more victims. “[I]t is well settled that, in determining the number of victims for SORA purposes, the hearing court is not limited to the crime of which defendant was convicted” (People v Gardiner, 92 AD3d 1228, 1229 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 801 [2012]). Here, the court properly considered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. GardinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. ChristieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. FilkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. FilkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. CurrentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.