Legal Opinion

Paffel v. Paffel

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1986No. 19423, 19462PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*98HALL, Chief Justice:

These cases, which were consolidated for purposes of appeal, arise out of the separation and subsequent divorce of Wayne C. Paffel (“appellant”) and Jean K. Paffel (“respondent”). Appellant seeks reversal of case No. 19423, in which he was ordered to pay permanent alimony to respondent. Appellant also seeks reversal of case No. 19462, in which summary judgment was entered in favor of respondent for alimony arrearages.

I

Appellant and respondent were married on June 18,1949, in Minnesota. The couple have two children who are both now adults. The parties separated on or about…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BrickeyUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Bundy v. Century Equipment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Jones v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Higley v. HigleyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hobelman Motors, Inc. v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GardinerUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Willey v. WilleyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Essential Botanical Farms, LC v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Martinez v. MartinezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ostermiller v. OstermillerUtah Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API