Legal Opinion

Essential Botanical Farms, LC v. Kay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2011No. 20090922PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 This appeal is rooted in a dispute over a parcel of land situated between adjoining landowners, Steven Kay and Essential Botanical Farms, LC (EBF). Mr. Kay is the record owner of the property, but EBF and its predecessors-in-interest have occupied the property for nearly fifty years. The district court quieted title to the property in favor of EBF on cross-motions for summary judgment after finding that the parties' predecessors-in-interest mutually acquiesced to a boundary marked by an old barbed wire fence.

12 Mr. Kay contends that the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Martinez v. Media-Paymaster Plus/Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Eggert v. Wasatch Energy Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RandolphUtah Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Anderson v. FautinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Linebaugh v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. North Fork Special Service District v. BennionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API