Legal Opinion

Hobelman Motors, Inc. v. Allred

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1984No. 18602PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice.

Defendant Richard Allred (“defendant”) appeals from a summary judgment that accorded full faith and credit to a Nebraska judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Hobel-man Motors, Inc. (“plaintiff”). Defendant challenges the summary judgment on the ground that there were material facts in dispute with respect to whether jurisdiction existed and whether the Nebraska procedure for notification met the requirements of due process of law. We reverse and remand.

Defendant correctly argues that jurisdiction and requirements for service, if properly raised, may be asserted as defenses in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Conn v. WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Fox v. Allstate Insurance CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Transamerica Title Insurance v. United Resources, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Strange v. OstlundUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Carnes v. CarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. James Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. D & L SUPPLY v. SauriniUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Data Management Systems, Inc. v. EDP CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Paffel v. PaffelUtah Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API