Legal Opinion

Lamb v. National Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1930No. Docket No. 6091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GATES, J., pro tem.

Appellant was engaged in the garage business in the year 1924 at Los Angeles, under the fictitious name of De Luxe Garage. He made repairs on an automobile belonging to one William Gross, and, the charges thereon being unpaid, commenced foreclosure of his lien. On October 1, 1924, Gross, who disputed the correctness of appellant’s charges, instituted a claim and delivery action to recover possession of the car. In the same suit Gross obtained an order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue restraining appellant from proceeding further with the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gardner v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. McCracken v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Olson v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. DeLuca v. BudkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Nelson v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Symes Cadillac, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API