Olson v. Glens Falls Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of defendant Glens Falls Insurance Company, Inc., after its demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend. We conclude that the complaint can be amended to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff ’s counsel has afforded no assistance to this court. He states in his brief "Frankly, counsel for appellant has not been enlightened by either the court below or opposing counsel concerning wherein the alleged failure of the Complaint to state a cause of action lies.” This statement is made in the face of citation by defense counsel, in points…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kane v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Blumenthal v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Nittler v. Continental Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Bridges v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cavaliere v. Duff's Business InstituteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Powers Regulator Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co. of New YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Porter v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. HenryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Bassett Federation of Teachers Local 727 v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.