Legal Opinion
Shaughnessy v. American Surety Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1903No. S.F. No. 2258PublishedCited by 23 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William M. Abbott, and Charles A. Shurtleff, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The following opinion, prepared by Henshaw, J., was delivered when this case was in Department :—
“This action is against the defendant surety, on an undertaking given in pursuance of section 1203 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It is brought by materialmen who furnished materials to the contractor. The bond, as to its terms and conditions, is not only precisely that contemplated by the above cited section, but it is expressly recited in the instrument that it is given ‘in pursuance of section 1203 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ’ It has been decided by this court in Bank (Gibbs v. Tally, 133…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gibbs v. TallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Carpenter v. FurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Coburn v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Cassel v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Poole v. . KermitNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. HolderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Loop Lumber Co. v. Van Loben SelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Rio Grande Lumber Co. v. DarkeUtah Supreme Court · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.