Gardner v. Donnelly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
— This is an action upon an undertaking given to procure the release of an attachment levied on the property of the defendant Donnelly. The court below gave judgment for the plaintiff on the pleadings, and the defendants appeal. It is alleged, in the complaint, that the plaintiff commenced an action against Donnelly to recover the sum of $630, with interest; that a writ of attachment was duly issued in the action and levied by the sheriff upon certain personal property of the said defendant; that, four days thereafter, Donnelly, as principal, and the other defendants, as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Grant v. SheerinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McMillan v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Green v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Rankin v. Sisters of MercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bailey v. Aetna Indemnity Co., of HartfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- First State Bank v. C. E. Stevens Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Powers v. ChabotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Brady v. OnffroyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.