Wilson v. Sturgis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action to recover the sum of $846, as commissions, alleged to be due plaintiffs, co-partners, as real estate brokers, upon the sale of defendant’s ranch situate in Contra Costa County. Plaintiffs had judgment as prayed for in their complaint. From the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial, the defendant appeals.
On the tenth day of May, 1883, defendant entered into a written contract with the plaintiffs, by the terms of which he authorized the latter to “ sell and take deposits” upon his ranch situate in Contra Costa County, consisting of 268 acres, for the sum…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Bohall v. DillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Miller v. SteenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Blood v. ShannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Neilson v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Howard v. BurrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Averill v. O'FarrellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.