Legal Opinion

Howard v. Burrow

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 1926No. Docket No. 5402PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant for compensation claimed to have been earned by him as a broker. The defendant appeared and filed an answer and a cross-complaint. The plaintiff answered the cross-complaint and a trial was had on the issues presented by those pleadings. As the trial court was sitting without a jury, it made findings. Those findings were in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed and has brought up a bill of exceptions.

After a short conversation between them the defendant wrote out, signed, and delivered to the plaintiff a writing as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wylie v. . Marine National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Coleman's Ex'r v. MeadeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
  3. Zeimer v. AntisellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Mayer v. . McCreeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ablett v. ClausonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Martin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Louis Lesser Enterprises, Ltd. v. RoederCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. Elizabeth Arden Sales Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API