Blood v. Shannon
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Second Judicial District, Plumas County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, C. J.
The defendant, being the owner of an undivided interest in certain real property in Plumas County, appointed and by deed constituted the plaintiff his true and lawful attorney, with authority to bargain, sell and convey the same for and in the name of the defendant, for the sum of eighteen thousand dollars in United States gold coin. The deed granting this power to the plaintiff was dated the 17th of August, 1864. The power granted was to continue irrevocable for fifteen days-from that date. On the nineteenth of the same month the-plaintiff, as the Court found, “…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Middleton v. FindlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by9 opinions
- Donley v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- California Land Security Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Wilson v. SturgisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Sherwood v. RosensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.