Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Seymour

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 1, 2002No. 86,431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This is a post-settlement controversy, initially between two sibling plaintiffs, Warren Brown Gillespie (Warren) and Polly *1388G. Townsend (Polly). With the death of the sibling plaintiffs in 1998, the controversy has become a battle between Warren’s estate (Warren) administered by his son James Gillespie, executor, and the Polly G. Townsend Revocable Trust (Polly). Warren and Polly disagree on who is responsible for litigation expenses incurred in a contingent fee case resulting in a $2,250,000 settlement recovery. The district court ruled that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Gerhardt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Ryder v. Farmland Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Heckman v. Zurich Holding Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2007
  3. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API