Legal Opinion

Ryder v. Farmland Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 1, 1991No. 64666PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This case involves a fee dispute between two law firms arising from the referral of a personal injury case. The controversy between the law firms concerns the division of a contingent fee, one-third of the recovery, resulting from a $2,500,000 settlement on behalf of the plaintiff, Donald Ryder. Ryder’s Kansas attorneys, Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown and Enochs, Chartered (Wallace, Saunders), who contend no referral fee is owing, filed a post-settlement motion to approve attorney fees and to resolve the dispute.

California lawyer Steven C.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Winsor v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  2. Rullman v. RullmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Palmer v. BreyfogleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  4. Torkelson v. Bank of HortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Crane v. CameronSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holstein v. GrossmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. Varney Business Services, Inc. v. PottroffSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Bank of Kansas v. DavisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API