Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Seymour

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 8, 1994No. 70,592PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an appeal from an award of punitive damages entered in an action by the beneficiaries of a trust for recovery of damages for oil and gas investments made by the Trust.

This is the third time the case has been before us. The factual background underlying the action is complex and is set forth in Gillespie v. Seymour, 250 Kan. 123, 823 P.2d 782 (1991), hereinafter referred to as Gillespie 1. In that opinion, inter alia, we affirmed the basic compensatory damage award against Paul Seymour, Jr., (hereinafter referred to as Seymour) in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Unified School District No. 490 v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Ditto v. McCurdyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Burton v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  5. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API