Legal Opinion
Gerhardt v. Harris
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided March 14, 1997No. 73,863PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
This case concerns a dispute over an attorney fee. Our Rule 223 (1996 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 242) concerning immunity arising from involvement in disciplinary proceedings is discussed and construed.
Plaintiff, Debbie Gerhardt, appealed the summary judgment dismissing her claims against heir former attorney, defendant Kevin C. Harris. The district court granted Harris’ motion in limine barring testimony of Stanton Hazlett, Chief Deputy Disciplinary Administrator, and denied Gerhardt’s motion to amend her petition. Hazlett was to testify that Harris…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Badger Pharmacal, Inc., D/B/A Wisconsin Pharmacal Company, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Company and Softsoap Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Modern Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Cinderella Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
- Albers v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- State v. VandiverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- SHAMBERG, JOHNSON & BERGMAN v. OliverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.