Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Seymour

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 28, 1993No. 68,691PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

McFarland, J.:

This is an appeal from an award of punitive damages entered in an action by the beneficiaries of a trust for recovery of damages for oil and gas investments made by the Trust.

The factual background is complex and is set forth in Gillespie v. Seymour, 250 Kan. 123, 823 P.2d 782 (1991), hereinafter re ferred to as Gillespie I. Originally, punitive damage awards were entered as follows:

For the period prior to July 1, 1987:

Dorothea Seymour $2,000,000

Paul A. Seymour, Jr. $2,000,000

Paul A. Seymour, III $ 25,000

For the period after July 1, 1987:

D…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Henderson v. HassurSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. Cantrell v. Amarillo Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Guardianship of the Person & Estate of Smith v. Merchants Mutual Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Will v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. Hawkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  4. Mynatt v. CollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Dorothea W. Seymour v. Grant Thornton and Fox & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API