Haney v. Alexander
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Plaintiffs assignment of error raises the single question of whether the trial court properly directed a verdict for defendant under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a). A directed verdict for defendant is proper only if plaintiffs evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support his claim. In ruling on defendant’s motion for directed verdict, the trial court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff and give plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference. Willoughby v. Wilkins, 65 N.C. App. 626, 631, 310 S.E. 2d 90, 94 (1983), disc. rev. denied, 310 N.C.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Huff v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Rucker v. High Point Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Koury v. FolloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Paris v. MICHAEL KREITZ JR., PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Nold Ex Rel. Nold v. BinyonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Cox v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Leatherwood v. EhlingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.