Legal Opinion

Huff v. Thornton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1975No. 4PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The defendants base their appeal upon 82 assignments of error, 52 of which are brought forward into their brief, the others being abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court; State v. Greene, 278 N.C. 649, 180 S.E. 2d 789. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss, individually, the assignments of error which have been preserved. They present the following questions: (1) Was there error in the court’s rulings upon the admission of evidence relating to the extent of the damage to the house? (2) Was there error in the court’s rulings upon the admission of evidence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Champs Convenience Stores, Inc. v. United Chemical Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Leftwich v. GainesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API