Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Mud Bay Logging Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1932No. 23866. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action was brought to recover for personal injuries suffered by appellant and for damages to his automobile, resulting from a collision between it and the gasoline speeder of respondent, operated on its railway, which occurred where the railway of respondent crosses the Shelton highway about four miles west of Olympia, at about seven o’clock in the evening on October 20, 1928.

After trial to a jury and a verdict in favor of appellant for the total sum of $6,250, personal injuries and property damages, respondent moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and, in the alternative,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Helliesen v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Fluhart v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Keller v. BrenemanWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Benson v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chess v. ReynoldsWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Burget v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bowen v. BaumgardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  4. Flaumer v. SamuelsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Davis v. BrowneWashington Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API